Discovering Belief

I’m spacing out in seminar.  Letting my thoughts drift.  They are drifting around ideas of finitude, mortality.  I think, “I am going to die.”  The thought does not move me.  Breath like waves.  Swirls and scuds.  I think, “Ada is going to die.”  All drifting ceases.  A great suck and onslaught.  The thought I had thought was my own turned enemy, tsunami.  And against it I think, “No.  She will not.”  I imagine her body blue, cold, still, and buried — every song emptied of her voice.  This would not be sufficient proof to me.  This would evidence nothing.  I think, “And I would never not talk to her.  And I would never be away from her.  Because I wouldn’t die either.  Because I am not going to die.”  The waters recover their rhythm, a new tide line marked.  In this way I discover that I believe in the immortality of the soul.

C.

Hats and Leaves

A teacher of mine boasts a “practical proof” that reading student papers is destructive to intellect. “Just grade a few papers then try to write anything: You’ll see what I mean.”  Cruel, but not without its truth.

Descartes behind us, Hamlet before us, their midterm papers back to them with a page of comments each, I’m feeble-tongued and finger-dumb.  A deadline with the writing group.  I email them,

If
Every word has to count
Then
I don’t know how to count
Count to infinity
Now add one
I can count to one hundred
But can’t go on

 

This week’s hosts respond, “We like your poem.  You’re still up to present.  House rules.”  Damn.

I ask my lover how he does it, goes in every day and makes.  He says, “It’s different for me.  It’s the realm of the sensible.  I’m moving objects around, setting them up in new ways, playing with textures and weights.  Look at my tools: I use a hammer, a drill, maybe a torch or a brush.  You’re doing something different, like alchemy but subtler.  Anything you work with, you’ve got to call into being.  It’s less like making, more like magic.  You don’t even have stuff to make potions with.  Writing’s all spells.”

How does one cast a spell again?  And once cast, how does one set it aside?  I’ve come across nothing–no art, no love–so total in its requirements.  So needy, and yet so imperial!  Making poor life speak its language and wear its stupid hats.  I’m up all night.  I’m late to everything.  Life’s labor for tea leaves given over to a master who barely knows how to swirl and dump, barely knows how to turn the cup and read.

C.

I Always Sleep With the Knife

We love we know not what, and therefore everything allures us.
–Thomas Traherne
How can anyone claim: “What you by no means know can by no means torment you? I am not the center fo what I know not, and torment has its own knowledge to cover my ignorance
–Maurice Blanchot
“I always sleep with the knife,” said the little robber maiden. “There is no knowing what may happen.”
–Hans Christian Andersen
All quoted from Karen Volkman’s Spar

Capital and Dignity

I run into Jonathan at the hacienda-cum-cafe near campus.  (This back in my hometown over Christmas.)  He asks, “Hey, do you have time to sit, to talk?”  I do.  ”Great!” he exclaims, closing his binder on an asymptote and wedging it wholesale in a tome titled “CALCULUS.”  He tucks his pencil behind his ear.  To my surprise, it sticks.  I cock my head to read his stack of spines: two volumes of Latin, Pitirim Sorokin’s The Ways and Power of Love, a slim volume on modal logic.  He leans over and gushes, “Look at you, Cat!  You’re doing it!  You’re the real deal: big city, ivory tower.  Tell me, what are you working on?”  I wince and laugh, “What am I working on?  What are you working on, Jonathan?” I gesture towards Modal Logic.  He laughs, “Same stuff.  It’s the Bruce Lee approach: ‘Don’t fear the man who’s practiced a thousand moves a single time, but the man who’s practiced a single move a thousand times.’” I guess, “You’re still reading Lonergan, then?”  He claps, ”You got it!  Insight is a book I can win an education through.  Does that make sense?”  ”It makes perfect sense, Jonathan.  I think I learned how to read reading Emerson’s essays.”

“Well, yeah, except you didn’t,” he quips.  I don’t understand.  He waves away my confusion, “I mean I’m really working from the ground up.  Start-point zero.”  Still, I don’t get it.  He frowns.  ”Have I not told you this, Cat?  I’m sorry, I thought I had.  K through twelve, I was in Special Ed.  Short bus and everything.”  He pushes his hair out of his eyes suddenly.  The pencil falls.  He catches it.  ”They thought I was retarded.”

I take a good look at him: his dark hair in furrows now, his sun-freckled forehead exposed.  Blue eyes, starred lashes, front teeth politely jostling for space.  How long have I known him?  A decade maybe.  And he’s how old?  Thirty something?  Nearing forty.  I was in love with him off and on for years, and even now, though he’s married and has a daughter–Mihal, a true wunderkind herself.  He smiles as I study him, holds his chin up just a bit, weaves his piano hands neatly in front of him.  He looks eminently intelligent.  I shake my head.  His smile fades.  He looks sad.  ”So I never took a Math class.  Not even Algebra.  I don’t remember being taught how to read.  And I still can’t spell.  It’s been a big push, from there to here.”

He interrupts himself, “But forget about here!  I want to know where you’re at.  I think about you a lot, Cat, what it would be like to be doing what you’re doing.  Remember when we did that McShane reading group?  And remember how he goes on about capital?  I mean, talk about capital!  It must be atmospheric in a place like where you are!  Such rich histories of thought!  I want you to tell me what you talk about out there.”  He laughs at himself, “I guess I want you to show me your lined pockets, share the wealth.”

I want to share the wealth!  I start to say something, start again, stop.  I’m embarrassed.  ”I don’t know how.”  He’s embarrassed by my embarrassment, “Oh, no.  I don’t mean to put you on the spot.  Forget about capital.  I’m just curious about your conversations, curious what kinds of things come up.”  I’m trying to come up with something, anything, now.  Scrambling: “I don’t know what we talk about, Jonathan.  Everything and nothing.  Same as here.  I mean, It’s different, of course.  It’s not that you’re wrong.   Every day is an education.  Like my first day of classes I had to ask what a bildungsroman was, and my second day of classes I had to confess that I didn’t know how to scan a line of poetry.  It’s been like that every day since: Very humbling.  But then also very exciting.  There’s this sense of an infinite inquiry: A tree of questions rooted and branching.  Like a family tree.  A genealogy you didn’t know you belonged to, one you can find yourself in.  I’m grateful.  So grateful . . . “

He smiles at me.  Still, it’s not what he’s after.  I know what he’s fishing for, just as I know that it’s not something I can bait and hook.  What can I offer him?  ”There’s some wonderful gossip.”  He raises his eyebrows.  I tell him everything I know – Levinas complained about the mattress; Arendt fought for a stocking fund; Freud sought the poor girl out at the reception and told her how very beautiful she was; Buber said no, but desperately wanted that kiss; Adorno fled the room at the sight of the young woman’s breasts; And it was Eliade himself who threw the lit cigar in the waste bin —  Eventually my stories run out.

Jonathan’s good enough to laugh.  I can feel his disappointment, but I can also feel his forgiveness.  I look again to his books.  Jonathan is the real deal.  He should be where I am, doing what I’m doing.  The trips to Europe, the tree of questions, the workshops and seminars and lectures and receptions, the parties, the gossip–these should all be his.

I begin to ask, “Jonathan, do you ever think about applying–?”  He cuts me off, “To graduate school?  Oh, Cat.  Of course I did, and do.  But, you know  I’m not kidding about not being able to spell.  When they gave me the job at the bookstore I couldn’t believe it.  I didn’t know if that was ever going to be something I could do: get a real job, and a sort of semi-intellectual one at that.  Now I’ve got this part-time teaching gig at the charter school too,  and never in a million years did I think that could happen.  Of course I just love teaching.”  He leans in toward me, “Sometimes I even find ways of sneaking Lonergan in.  Like I’ll write the first terms of a sequence “2, 4, 6, 8 . . . ” or “2, 4, 8, 16 . . . ” When the kids start shouting out what comes next, I’m like, ‘What just happened?’  It’s a real question, you know.  ’How does that happen?  What’s up with reality and mindedness such that we’re anticipating it intuitively?’”  I’m nodding vigorously.  ”But, Cat, I’ve got to be realistic about where I came from, how far I’m going to be able go.  In grade school I sat next to a kid who whammed his head against his desk repeatedly.  Graduate school would be terrible for me.  I would be so unsure of myself at every turn.  And what about my wife, my daughter?  I’m not going to ask them to leave their home . . . ”  I knock it off with the nodding.  I think about his wife, his daughter, their little bungalow down by the rose garden, their community of friends here, the winter potlucks and summer bonfires.

Exactly what do I think I have that he doesn’t? 

He’s still talking.  I’ve missed the first part of what he’s said.  ” . . . I really do appreciate it, Cat–the interest you take in my intellectual pursuits, the faith you have in me.  Maybe this is what dignity amounts to–protecting yourself somewhat from the others’ affirmation.”

C.

Red Flags

The Problem with “Grown-Up Love” as I’ve pictured it–problems of prose aside, which abound–is the inescapable suggestion that hiccups have their explanatory causes, that defeat and resentment can be wound back into mutual care through an honest confession on the edge of a bed. Pat his knee, affirm my love, all will be set right.  Sure, for now, but not for any longer.  One hopes (I hope) that in some possible world Heather’s crazy wisdom–the temptation to write “wisdom,” but that’s to project my weakness of spirit on the strength of her insight–could hold even for the couple of a few days ago who could barely keep their peace . . .

C.

Grown-Up Love

For Christmas we got ourselves a king-sized bed. I bought the mattress with my honorarium from the Macbeth seminar.  He built the frame in his studio out of salvaged poplar and ash.  For two years we’ve slept, or not slept, on a double.  I’m small enough, but he’s 6’4″, and we’re both inclined to throw a knee and an elbow.  Most nights one of us ended up on the couch in the living room, the other creeping out in the morning, “Sorry, babe.  The bed’s all yours now.  No, no, you take it.  I’m up for good.  You sleep.  I’ll shower and get the coffee going.”

Our new bed is so big we can sleep without touching.  And in the weeks since the holiday that’s what we’ve done.  He’s home late from the studio.  I’m out the door early, walking to campus, or catching the train north.  Crossing paths in the kitchen, he kisses my forehead, asks if we’ve got any cereal left.  ”No.  I haven’t had a chance to go to the store.  We’re out of greens too, and low on toilet paper.”  ”I’ll do the shopping.  You’ve been doing all the housework.”  ”No, I’ll do it . . . ”  I’m fingering the waistband of his jeans.  He swats at me, smiling, “Hey!  Stop that.”  But when I insist, he becomes serious.  Uncurling my crabbed fingers, he says, “Come on, babe.  Not now.”

Not now, not ever.  And he’s right: I have been doing all the housework.

“Let’s go out dancing like we used to do!  They’re spinning vinyl at that little club on Dickens: You know you want to . . . ” I’m standing over him, swinging my hips.  He reaches up to me, “Sweetheart, you’re smokin’.  But I’m tired.  Let’s watch a movie or something.”  I let my disappointment show.  He sighs deeply, turns over.  ”You can go, Cat.  See if Daniel or Scott want to join you.  I’m in for the night.”  I rage.

I rage.  He shuts down.  We make stiff peace over small favors.  ”Will you drop this off at the library while you’re on campus today?”  ”Yeah, and I’ve been meaning to ask: Can I take your truck Tuesday?”  ”Sure.  What for?”  ”The department is getting rid of some bookshelves.  I thought they’d fit well in that spot in the entry.”  ”Okay, but let me come with you.  You’ll need help with the lifting.  Tuesday, you said?”  ”Mmhm.  Thanks.”

We’re good friends.  He makes me laugh.  I slip my hand in his back pocket.  He asks, “What are you, the Artful Dodger?” and pretends to pull a handkerchief from my ear.  I let myself smile.  But when I rise on my tiptoes to slip him some tongue and he makes a face, I’m furious.

We talk.  Of course we talk.  I feel rejected.  He feels misunderstood.  I say things like, “This is a really important part of our relationship to me: intimacy, tenderness–” He finishes my sentence, “–sex.”  ”Yes, sex!  And I don’t see why I should be made to feel bad about that.  We are young and beautiful and in love . . . ”  ”Yes, we are all those things, Cat, but I can’t be responsible for making you feel like it.”  ”What do you mean ‘responsible’?  I’m asking you to partner me.”  I’m turning hysterical, “You make me sound like some gaping pit of need.”  He’s crossing his arms, uncrossing them, bringing his hands up to his face, running his fingers through his hair.  I go on, “I am not a monster!  I am not preying on you!  These are reasonable things to want!   He looks utterly defeated.  Still I don’t stop, “Other people want these things!  I know because everywhere I go, people advertise their desire.  The world is open to me the way I’m open to you, but you, you’re closed.”  He rolls his eyes and throws up his hands, “Fine, Cat.  Other people want you.  What do you want me to say to that?  I won’t be bullied by you.  You’ll either stay because you want to, or you’ll go and I’ll be devastated.  But I’m not going to play this game.”  I can barely hear him.  ”What game?

Our friends throw parties, host dinners, invite us out.  ”Were you planning on coming to Amy and Mary’s tonight?”  ”What’s going on there?”  ”Their joint birthday party, remember?  They sent out that email.  You and I talked about it last week.”  ”You know, babe, I just don’t think I’m up to it tonight.”  That’s fine.  I figured.  Coat, keys, hat, and gloves.  ”Love you.”  ”Love you, too.  Have fun.”

The party is packed.  Daniel and Scott are both there.  I like the way Daniel touches my arm as he leans in for a kiss, “Nice to see you.”  I notice the cut of Scott’s trousers–where they tug and bunch.  All the boys look ruddy and ready.  The girls look rosy and ready too.  In the too-hot hallway I run into Heather.  Heather is a prodigy: several years ahead of me in the PhD, but a handful of years younger than me, staggeringly verbal, pretty in a wholesome way, evangelical, gay, and never been kissed.  She tends to text me throughout the day: shorthand epistles about the ups and downs of her inner life–feelings of loneliness, feelings of belonging. I tend not to respond, or to respond only minimally, “Boo. Sounds rough. So sorry, Heather,” or “Yay!  Happy day!,” that kind of thing.  She doesn’t seem to mind my reticence, and I only sometimes resent being thrown into a big-sister-meets-surrogate-girlfriend role.  ”How are you?” she asks a little too meaningfully,  cocking her head, and resting her hand heavily on my shoulder.”  I have no idea what to say.  I make a decision: I am going to tell the truth, and to Heather of all people, in this sweltering hallway.  ”Not good . . . ”  I tell her about the spats, the selfishness, my deepening skepticism about my capacities to love.

Heather takes a deep breath, nods knowingly.  ”It’s just like me and Julia,” she says, eyes intense and unblinking.  I blink for us both.  Julia is a young woman Heather sometimes sees across campus, a distant crush of some tragic depth, the Dulcinea of her texted epistles.  I’m trying to think how exactly S and I are just like her and Julia, but Heather’s already explaining: ”I know that I’m called to love Julia, whether or not she loves me back.  I’ve been charged by God to care for her and her happiness, to do everything in my power to bring her comfort and joy.  Even if she were in a relationship with someone else, even if I were in a relationship with someone else, I would love her.  For as long I’m living, she’s mine in that way.”  Heather’s voice breaks.  Tears mount her lashes.   I’m still struggling to see the connection.  ”Cat, you know better than anyone how down I get when I’m thinking of Julia in terms of a reciprocal economy.  I mean I love her so much, and its clear she so much as knows who I am.  I want her to receive my love, and I want to receive her love in return.  But you know, this is the meaning of our baptismal promise: That we’re already receiving the infinite bounty of God’s love.  We don’t have to worry about being given in kind.  We can give and give and never go dry.”

For once I’m not drinking, which means there’s no wine to blame for the dumb clarity her speech brings.  I have to go.  Coat, keys, hat and gloves.  I drive slow for the ice.  He’s already asleep when I crawl into bed.  I sidle over to him, wedge my hand under his hip.  ”Hey babe,” he murmurs.  I kiss his shoulder.  He kisses the air.  I resolve to be better.

I am better.  Kind of.  Two nights in a row, I have a hot meal ready for him when he comes home .  He’s surprised and grateful and promises to do the dishes.  I end up doing them.  But I sing while I do them: loudly.  I imagine I’m singing all that would-be anger right out of me.

A few days later, grocery bags in hand, I crack.  I say that I can’t do this, that we need to work out some kind of alternative model.  ”What does that mean?”  I don’t know.  I hear myself say, “Open relationship.”  He doesn’t believe in open relationships.  Neither do I and he knows it.  He thrusts his hands in his pockets, shakes his head, leaves the room.  I put away the groceries before going to find him.  He’s in the bedroom, perched on the edge of the bed.  ”Hey.  Sorry.  Want to talk?” I ask.  ”Yes,” he says quietly.  Something’s wrong.  ”Want to talk in the living room?”  ”No, I’d rather talk here.”  I hear the sea in my ears.  For a second  I think he’s going to tell me her name (“Her name is . . . “), but no, that’s not it.

He says that he hasn’t told me, because it’s gross and embarrassing, and because he thought he could deal with it, or get it dealt with, but then it kept getting worse, and now it’s real bad.  I’m confused.  What are we talking about?  He reddens at the word, ”Hemorrhoids.  It’s an old person thing.  Young people almost never get them.  But I’ve got them.”  He looks up at me, “Do you even know what they are, Cat?”  ”Um . . . I think so.”  I’m still confused.  I sink to my knees, searching his face.  He stares at his hands.  ”You know my insurance doesn’t cover this stuff, and I was trying to get in at this clinic for a long time, but when I finally got in, the doctor told me to do all the same over-the-counter stuff I’ve already been doing.  And what I really need is to see a specialist, but the clinic people won’t give me a referral til two months have gone by, and of course it’s been almost six months of this.  And I don’t know how I’m going to afford the specialist, or the surgery if that’s what it comes to.”  He shakes his head, “This stuff doesn’t matter.”  ”Of course it matters!  Let’s get you on my insurance.  We can go to the courthouse tomorrow.”  ”No.  Stop.  You were just saying that you wanted an open relationship.  We’re not getting married tomorrow.”  I am an idiot.  He continues, ”Look, what matters for us is just that I’m in a lot of pain.  And I know I should have told you.  I should have told you right away, but it became this stupid shameful thing for me.”  My heart drops: I made it a stupid, shameful thing for him.  ”It’s my fault.”  ”It’s not your fault.”  ”It is.”  He’s stern, “No, it’s not.  It’s just that it hurts to stand and especially to lift and I’m lifting all day at the studio . . . ”  I cut in, “And it hurts to make love.”  ”Yeah.  It hurts to make love, babe.”  I’m relieved to hear myself say, “That’s easy, babe: We won’t make love.”  I’m relieved also to find that I mean it.  He looks at me hard, “But it’s important to you . . . ”  I make a dopey face at him, “If we’re in it for the long haul, this is just the beginning.  You and I are going to be administering one another’s suppositories, and God help us, making something fun and kinky out of it.”  I’m laughing, but he’s not.  Too close to home.  I pull back.  ”Have you thought about what you want for dinner?”

Over the phone Kase asks how “grown-up” love is going.  I tell her it’s going, unglamorously, but going.  She and J are getting married this July.  They’re waiting to have sex until after the wedding.  Sometimes she talks about her virginity like it’s a big-ticket item, something to be purchased through due diligence and devotion.  I worry that that’s to make a jeweler’s ad out of her nuptials.  I try to explain the intuition: “Self-respect has got to mean something more than a high starting-bid, sis.  We’ve got to let go of commodifying ourselves, our bodies, our pleasures, our virtues, our gifts.  This whole idea of demanding a fair market price for what we have to offer: that’s to prostitute ourselves and our love.”  She gets it, kind of.  But really, who am I to try to teach her these things?  ”Grown-up love is going.  I miss that teenage feeling.”  I can hear Kase smile into the phone.  For a moment she breaks into song.  We laugh.

C.

Under God-Empty Skies

Dirk asks–

Is there a “Judaism” (or a Christianity or such) apart from what is done by Jewish people, and who is or is not a Jew, how will we know?

And I respond–

Is there a Judaism, a Christianity, apart from what we find done in its name–apart from the specificities of history which are also its many inconsistencies? Yes, I think so, if only in this: In judging those inconsistencies we will appeal to a Judaism (a Christianity) that transcends all these. Of course, what we mean by that transcendent term–invested now with the power of arbitration, decision–will be the site of new struggle, but it would be wrong to reduce the term to that struggle. Words are not reducible to the grabs we make for them, they have logics of their own, ways they will and won’t bend for us. To take this point seriously is to recognize language as always already scriptural, always already a discipline of obedience.

To which Dirk replies–

I would not have expected: Words are not reducible to the grabs we make for them, they have logic of their own, ways they will and won’t bend for us, but now I know.

And somehow I’m not satisfied, but want to say further–

I imagine Emerson, Kierkegaard, and Wittgenstein in a boat-shaped cloud, descending. Such visions! I’m surprised by your surprise, Dirk. Perhaps if I were caught up in a fog of Rorty . . .  But I’m not a new pragmatist, you know.  Why am I not a new pragmatist? There are certainly affinities: historicism, the truth of skepticism, an emphasis on how tentative our intentions are, how fallible our executions, how partial our perspectives (partial in both senses of the word), and then life as art and improvisation . . .  Perhaps it comes down to nothing more (though also, I’m adamant, nothing less) than that I want to claim the term ‘transcendence’.  

Let me try to say something more: We’re all of us practiced in the pitfalls of relativism: Without our shared maxims, our axioms and programs, What will we appeal to? How will we agree?  Rorty responds, “We’ll appeal to what we find on hand, attractive, and fit to the exigencies of the moment. And we’ll agree–if we agree–the same way we’ve always agreed, which is to say imperfectly and only for the time being . . . ” So far, so good. It’s not here that I want to intervene. What I miss in Rorty, and what I miss in those who want to claim him (and perhaps my cloud men with him), is some recognition that at some point the exigencies of the moment may be such (will certainly be such in our world of nuclear stockpiles) that what we appeal to will have to (I’m claiming anthropological as opposed to historical necessity here) smack of Morality, and with Morality, Myth, and Metaphysics.  I suppose I’m with Hans Jonas on this point: I think his critique of Heidegger’s ontology, as an ethical vacuum, applies just as well to any philosophy that doesn’t dare take itself up in ethical terms.

What does it mean to ‘dare’ to take oneself up in ethical terms, or to say things that ‘smack’ of Metaphysics? ‘Dare’ is a strange word, ‘smack’ even a stranger.  Rorty’s not going to teach me anything new when he points out the god-empty sky.  I don’t fantasize mute concert before manifest Truths, hypnotic oratory, the world converted.  But it’s precisely because I don’t fantasize that, that I count it a feat of courage to try to speak Truth, to try to say something about precisely that for which we have no words . . .  (Take this as a working definition of ‘prophecy.’)  Rorty promises nothing, so it’s no crime when he delivers little; but I want philosophers–Jonas is a great example of this–who recognize that we are built to overreach ourselves, that we can’t but grasp beyond our every limit. To refuse the claim of Metaphysics, for instance, is just to deny that we are all of us already in the grip of some form of it (whether materialism or capitalism or scientism or psychology or idolatry of whatever kind), and worse to deprive ourselves of the means of critique.

Wm James is famous for his “belief in believing,” but belief doesn’t work that way . . . Conviction isn’t meta. It isn’t formal and formally applicable, certainly not formally applicable to itself. Conviction is co-born with its content, and co-born anew every time. We have to remain capable of conviction (capable also of its failures and hard lessons, of course), capable of Truth-claims, yes-saying and no-saying, capable of putting our strange dreams to words, of sharing them with others, of finding our dreams in theirs, capable of all this and of prayer.

(Thanks, Dirk.)

C.

Mother Whitman on the Interior Lowlands

The Prairie States

A newer garden of creation, no primal solitude,
Dense, joyous, modern, populous millions, cities and farms,
With iron interlaced, composite, tied, many in one,
By all the world contributed—freedom’s and law’s and thrift’s society,
The crown and teeming paradise, so far, of time’s accumulations,
To justify the past.

WW, Leaves of Grass

Oh, but . . .

To choose between Judaism and Christianity is, I suppose, still a live issue for me.

SC,  ”An Apology for Skepticism”

Oh, but that’s a bit pat isn’t it?  Protestant chick draws Pauline distinction: Crowd goes wild.  When I detect legalism, distinguish the dead letter from the living spirit, what am I doing really?  Years and years ago, in my undergraduate thesis defense I found myself asking, with no small amount of trepidation, “Yes, but how recognizably Jewish is Buber’s theology?”  And now, no less itchy to be venturing the position from outside the tradition, I’m prepared to at least lend Yeshayahu Leibowitz an ear when he says on no uncertain terms that Judaism is incompatible with Christianity.  If Judaism is essentially service to God in accordance with His Law (and of course it may not be), Christianity is essentially a disruption of that service, an explicit abrogation of the Law.

(MN made an appearance at the recent Society of Jewish Ethics meeting.  She couldn’t stay long, was singing at her synagogue that night, would in fact have to duck out before the session’s end, and “Please, no photos.”  In response to a highly anomalous presentation on a statistical analysis of certain Orthodox Jews’ professed moral convictions, she raised the objection, “Why assume that you’ve got to look at Orthodox Jews to study religious Jewish morality?”  She went on, “I really take issue with this kind of reasoning: That Orthodox Jews are the ‘real Jews,’ the ‘religious Jews,’ whereas Reform Jews might as well be secular.”  She concluded, “I actually find the exact opposite to be true. Reform Jews are motivated by respect for the moral law, whereas Orthodox Judaism is fetishistic, totemistic.”  She did not go so far as to say “idolatrous.”  In the audience some gasped.  Many laughed.  She laughed with them.  A few audience members clapped.  I sat on my hands, gnawed my lips.)

As interested as I am in the question of what Judaism is, the question I want to work on here (want to begin to work on here) has to do with Christianity.  Antisemitism is a peril to the world.  And here, now, I want to have the courage to own that something structural in me, some foundational architecture of my thought is wholly given over.  What is this severance package Saint Paul worked out for us?  And what hope for Christianity if we can’t strike a new deal?

(And we?  We who?  We Pagans?  We Jews?)

C.